We are here for a purpose. That purpose is served
because we come into the sanctuary. This room is not the sanctuary—it may
provide a setting for the sanctuary. There is a sanctuary if we ourselves bring
it. This could be seen as one of the initial purposes: that there might be a
sanctuary in this place because of us. It either is so or it isn't so—because
of us.
Here is a very convenient setting for a specific focus
of the sanctuary, but it is entirely our own responsibility as to whether the
sanctuary is here or not. We may have some assistance in the matter. One of the
factors is that this has been the setting for a sanctuary, lo these many years,
and therefore is somewhat imbued with the atmosphere of the sanctuary. When we
come together we cannot rest upon what has happened here in
the past. We may take advantage of it, so that the radiance of the sanctuary
may be present and intensified. This may happen only because we are willing
that it should. This certainly indicates that we are not here for our own
benefit, to get anything for ourselves. This is unlike most human activities.
There certainly needs to be a difference from what is the common human experience.
So we have a purpose, not to add to human woes or
to increase the destructiveness already present in the world but to provide
what is necessary to introduce what can only come by reason of the sanctuary—the
sanctuary which in this instance we ourselves provide here. Surely we
understand these things. The sanctuary is a radiant place, to the extent that
our experience is that of radiant people. There is really no magic in this. It
isn't a mystery. It isn't really even a mystical matter. It is a very practical
state of affairs, within which we are either capable of operating or we are
not. Most of us have had ample opportunity to discover the truth of all this,
not only as it relates to those occasions when we are together in this setting
but to the continuing experience of the sanctuary in every moment of our daily
living. It isn't something to be turned on and off.
We enter the sanctuary through the door of stillness.
Coming through that door we discover the radiance of the sanctuary, the beauty
of it, the living, moving, changing creative process which is found there. All doing should
be done in the sanctuary. Most human doing is done in the environment, because
forms—external things, events—loom so large in the minds and hearts of human
beings.
It seems that mankind has become lost in this external
world of things, people and events, projecting all this into the primary position,
insofar as individual attitude is concerned. This seems to be necessary in
order to survive, but, as we have often noted, human beings don't survive anyway.
So that could hardly be the way to go. And yet I'm sure we all still find
ourselves somewhat pushed and pulled by what is occurring in the environment
around us. This pushing and pulling happens because of what is happening in our
own hearts and minds, in our own reactions. Obviously if one reacts to external
things, the external thing is in control. There is no order or design then in
human experience, so there is the frantic endeavor to try to order it all
somehow, to get it to conform to some human view of the way it should be. Of
course all these human views tend to conflict with one another, so there is
conflict. Here is the way to non-survival. It has become such an ingrained
habit in human experience that it is anticipated, generation after generation,
that no one will survive. But there is a sanctuary—blotted out of course by all
this involvement with external things, forms and events, which are deemed to be
so very important, when all they are is a reflection of what is present in the
human hearts and minds of those who are temporarily present.
There is a passage in the Book of Revelation that
could be pertinent to our present experience as we play our part in giving place
to the sanctuary. This is the last chapter of Revelation—the 14th and 15th
verses say this: "Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may
have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the
city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and
idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie."
Most people reading that last verse would say, "Ha
ha, that's not me!" But the fact of the matter is that it is. It is the human
state being described here— perhaps in symbolic language, but nevertheless it
is not very difficult to recognize human characteristics if we examine the
description a little bit: dogs, for instance. Perhaps the thought may spring to
mind, "man's faithful friend." Dogs in this context would relate,
surely, to scavengers. In that setting of old particularly, and presently in
many places, the dogs survive by scavenging. And a lot of human beings survive
by scavenging. I'm not talking about those particular people who pick over the
garbage in a literal sense, but most everyone picks over the garbage in a
symbolic sense. We tend to survive on one another's garbage—that is,
temporarily. It's not a very healthy diet. So one of the human characteristics
could be said to be that of scavenging.
Sorcerers! Are there any sorcerers around? One
doesn't have to have a conical hat to be a sorcerer. A sorcerer is a good
description of anyone who manipulates. Manipulators. The world is full of them,
but one might just as well look in the mirror. Here is a very straightforward
description of what one might call human nature.
Then come the whoremongers. A lot of people are very
self-righteous in this field. But who would these be? I suppose one could use a
word which would be apt: enticers.
The economic system of the Western world—of everywhere, as far as that is
concerned—is based in this matter of enticing, isn't it? The magazines of this
day have very few articles in them but are virtually all advertisements, enticements.
And individually speaking we endeavor to get our way through methods of
enticement, as long as we remain trapped in this human-nature condition.
Murderers! Any murderers here this morning? Of
course. I suppose one could recognize very easily that if you drain someone of
their lifeblood the physical form will be dead. And the drainers of lifeblood
could be referred to as parasites. In one way or another most everyone is a parasite,
sucking the blood from somebody else—very obvious in many cases, perhaps not so
obvious from the standpoint of one's own experience, until one takes a good
honest look at it. Those are slain from whom the lifeblood is drained. We all
tend to be vampires in this sense, living on others one way or another,
sometimes obviously so, sometimes it's hidden.
Idolaters! Of course, we know all about that. I
suppose you could describe idolaters in this context as slaves to heredity. As
we easily can see, virtually everyone is a slave to the past. In fact it's deemed
to be quite commendable to be a slave to the past if it's the right kind of
past. But we cannot be in the sanctuary while being slaves to the right kind of
past or the wrong kind of past, slaves to heredity. This is the usual human
state, experienced quite unconsciously. It's in our genes, after all. But this
is describing those who are without—outside of the sanctuary.
In accordance with our participation together this morning,
how much of each of us as individuals is outside of the sanctuary and how much
is inside? It always looks a bit fruitless when facts are faced, because
virtually everyone would have to admit that they were probably about ninety
percent outside. Perhaps we have had opportunity to edge a little closer in, if
we were willing, and to find the door of stillness, so that heart and mind are
no longer jerked around by all these factors which are without.
I haven't gone into these things in any depth, you
know. I don't think it's profitable to do so, but it is necessary that one admits
to oneself that there is a depth to it. There is far more than can be touched on
in a few words. It is not so much a matter of words anyway. It is a matter of
one's own willingness to come out of that state into the sanctuary through the
door of stillness.
There is a final classification here: "Whosoever
loveth and maketh a lie." It expands a little bit on the classification of
liars. I suppose this could be summarized by saying, the self-willed. Self-willed human
beings cannot possibly express the truth; therefore they must be liars.
We have this rather complete description of those
who are outside of the sanctuary, outside of the city, the city where man, male
and female, belongs. Virtually the whole human population is outside. By and
large it has exhibited very little willingness to be anywhere else. There are
those who have earnestly and sincerely sought to come in by their own efforts,
trying to be good according to some formula; but they never succeeded that way.
They stayed out. They stayed identified with these various characteristics.
We present ourselves now at the door of the sanctuary. A consideration of the things we have been looking at may be a little
disturbing. If we are honest, that is probably so. In this case then the door
of stillness remains closed. I'm sure all of us in one way or another, being
part of the human population on earth, have had our troubles—we've known a
troubled state. Sometimes particular emphasis is placed, in various ways, so
that we may be inclined to take the attitude that life is hard. As we have
noted before, if we think it's hard we haven't known what life is. All we have
known is what the processes of dying are. The yoke of life is easy and the
burden of it is light. It doesn't weigh much. It is also radiant—it's radiant
in the sanctuary.
Most of us have our troubles, and we endeavor to
get them to straighten out one way or another. Sometimes they are environmental
troubles, sometimes they are more internal troubles, health troubles perhaps.
And there usually is a rather frantic looking around for someone to fix us up.
You can't come into the sanctuary with your troubles. You have to check them at
the door. The door is the door of stillness. How much of our time is occupied
by trying to dispel our troubles? To that extent we are excluding ourselves
from the sanctuary. There is no trouble in the sanctuary, so obviously you
can't bring your troubles in, because that would introduce trouble into the
sanctuary. That is quite impossible. It can't be done. There is a cherubim at
the gate with a flaming sword. He won't let you by. Leave your troubles behind.
You can't leave your troubles behind if you are so wrapped up in them that you
think you can't survive at all without getting someone to straighten them out.
But you find in the end that no one can straighten them out. And, as it was
put, you die in your sins—in your troubles.
Troubles don't need to be corrected. Problems don't
need to be solved. All that needs to happen is that these things should be transcended,
one should be where they are not. As long as one insists on existing where they
are, one will be troubled by them. And it is absolutely futile to try to find a
solution. Of course this is being done on the grand scale in the world all the
time. People are trying to find solutions. Anything that human beings do to try
to solve their problems makes them worse, always. Oh it may look good for the
moment, but take a look at the world, which is the result of generation after
generation for millennia past trying to solve their problems. Why continue in
that downward slide? Well presumably because most people don't know any other
way to go. Do we? If we do, will we go in that way, or will we still trust the downward
slide? While we still have some little connection with life, surely there is
the place to discover a transcendent experience, to discover what life really
is. We are all so thoroughly familiar with these processes of dying, which are
very troublesome.
"Rise up, my love, my fair one." Lift up
your eyes, to start with. Well we've lifted our eyes a little and seen
something other than the usual human condition. There is a true state—there is
the reality of life. Life characterizes the whole universe. The only part of
that universe which is not characterized by life is right here—the human
experience. Why? Well we have described it before: "Because I want to get
my own way. After all, it's a good way; I'm a good person; I'm going to get my
own way." The ways of human beings relate to all these
external things, so he immediately becomes a manipulator. In order to
manipulate he has to suck somebody's blood. All these things come into the
picture and we have the continuing condition of being outside of the sanctuary.
And yet human beings are clamoring to come in. "We don't like this. It's
very uncomfortable out here." Well one would hope it would be. No one
should be encouraged to stay out.
Let go. Rise up. Don't imagine that you will ever
find an answer in the realm of form. It isn't there. One seeming answer leads
to a dozen further problems, until the problems are so immense that everybody
is sunk. Let there be the evidence of the sanctuary, and no one can come into the
sanctuary except through the door of stillness—being still within oneself. Most
people seem to spend their lives seething inside. It's not surprising that we
have all these physical ailments. Rise up. Come to the door of stillness, where
it is recognized that as long as you are trying to work out your problems, that
is self-will, that is the state of the liar and it ends in disaster, always.
We have considered these things together so that we
might not be identified with the problem state. We can see it—"only with
thine eyes"—we can see it without being involved in it. Come clear, so
that there may be evidence of the way, the truth and the life. The only
evidence of the way, the truth and the life available within the scope of human
awareness is through one's own experience. One may be encouraged by the
experience of another, but one never knows the truth except for oneself.
So, as we have been willing and sufficiently still
to come into the sanctuary, we have been able to see much without being involved
with what we see. And we carry this transcendent level of experience into our
living, so that we never allow the form of things to become the dominant
factor. There is always something else happening. We call it the creative
process. "Well the creative process doesn't relate to this little thing
that is going on over here. I can handle this and disregard the creative
process"—disregard what is natural in the sanctuary. Well if you are without,
of course you will do that. You will disregard it. It won't enter into
consciousness even. But there is always something more going on, no matter what
it is one is doing, what it is that is present in one's environmental
situation. There is something back of it going on. There is a creative process.
Look at that.
Don't get mesmerized, hypnotized by the form—"We've
got to get the form exactly right." You never get it right on that basis.
It will be right when it is allowed to be a part of the creative process. It's
the only way it will be right, and that transcends what anyone wants. We let it
emerge the way it will emerge. Let's do
it in our momentary experience. That's the only place we have to
let it happen—not some great thing that's going to occur way over there
somewhere. It's going to happen within the scope of what we are doing.
We rejoice to come into the sanctuary, so that the
form of things no longer dominates, and we begin to perceive back of the form.
Whatever the form may be, whatever the circumstance, the situation may be,
there is something working out. Let's see that, instead of being blinded by the
form. All things work together to perfection for those who are identified with
that state which abides in the sanctuary.
Let us lift up our eyes. Let us let our hearts and
minds, and indeed our bodies, be lifted up to that level of things where there
is no need to solve any problems; there aren't any to be solved. Rise up, my
love, my fair one, and come away.
There is a story in the beginning
of the Bible which speaks of a woman by the name of Eve, who wanted to have her
own way. That is where the trouble started, and that is exactly where it
continues. As it turned out she had a pretty sad experience. She not only lost
herself and her womanliness, she lost her man, and found a pale male creature
as a substitute, and then proceeded to complain about him: "Look where I
may, I cannot find a man. Therefore I have to depend upon myself to establish
control in this rather limited state, and so I am determined, one way or
another, to have my own way." This may seem to be rather a brash way of
putting it but it is the fact nevertheless. Complaining about the absence of a
man, she apparently fails to recognize that all the men that have put in an
appearance over the course of the ages have been through her. She may say, "Well
men want to have their way too." Of course! They put in an appearance on
earth through her and, in the early years of life at least, they are thoroughly
imbued with the female determination to have her own way.
There is an interesting passage in
the Book of Revelation where there was a woman in labor apparently. She brought
forth a man child. There was another character on hand ready to take charge,
but this man child was caught up to God and to His throne. Usually this is
interpreted as meaning that here was a portrayal of what did happen insofar as
Jesus was concerned. But here is a portrayal insofar as every man child is
concerned who is born into the world. This woman was apparently a remarkable
character, clothed with the sun and all, and willing for this to transpire. So
her son was caught up to God and to His throne and delivered from the control
of the dragon, who was hopefully standing by—the intent being that there might
be a man. A man is a man because of heaven, because of being caught up to God
and to His throne. There must be a man on earth. We have the record of one
in particular, the One who was called Jesus. Here was a man who carried
authority. He carried authority because, remarkably, having been brought up by
a woman He did not fall into the trap of emulating her in trying to do what He
wanted to do in the human sense.
I am sure I speak with the
greatest of confidence when I say of all the men within the sound of my voice
now, every last one of them, including myself, were intent upon doing what they
wanted to do. Anyone here who would dispute that point? I trust not, because I
would call him a liar. I am not describing the situation this way so that the
men can then say, "Well all the women are to blame; after all, I was brought
up by a woman"—women probably. Some of you may have had the experience of
an older sister too, who established the idea that one should do what one wants
to do. Of course there was, no doubt, a certain amount of discipline involved,
for some anyway, when what the little boy wanted to do was considered to be
bad: "Shouldn't do that—naughty." But this didn't in any way detract
from the idea that one needs to do what one wants to do, presumably provided it
is good. "Just don't do the bad things; you will find it's much more
useful to do the good things, and then you will be a success." Of course
some found out there was some sort of a fallacy in this and so they did the bad
thing anyway. But whatever the experience may have been, it was all based in the
idea that one should do what one wants to do. Of course living cheek by jowl
with a lot of other people, one has to modify it a bit so that you don't tread
on too many toes; otherwise you won't be able to get what you want to get.
Anyway, here is the picture of the
state of mankind: the men playing at being men, having been brought up by
women; and the women intent upon maintaining their control over men, but in any
case maintaining a hand on the way things go. A hopeless state: fallen women—that
is one way of putting it—establishing control over fallen men. We have looked
at this before, but I reiterate the matter because there is only one way out of
the condition, and that is that there should be a man on earth. This is clearly
seen from the standpoint of the creative process. That is why the Master put in
an appearance. He put in an appearance for both men and women, that there might
be a point on earth, a point of authority, spiritual authority, which was
uncontrolled by the human urge to do what one wants to do and to get what one
wants to get. There is no way out of the human impasse without that. There has
to be such a point that will not conform to the female requirements. I became
aware of this myself by reason of Uranda back along the way and found myself,
at a certain point, projected into the focus of this requirement.
Of course the endeavor to do what
one wants to do, as I have indicated, was no longer limited to the female. It
was part of the character of the male too. If I point to the original female
action it is not to put anyone down but merely to face the fact of it. That is
where it occurred, and it will not un-occur without a man. It has been an
impasse, hasn't it, because the woman determined how the men should behave, and
then when the men behaved the way she had determined they should behave she
would complain about it and say there is no man there. And there has been this
perennial seeking of a man—"my own personal man, my puppet." Sadly,
men have gone along with it, and only broken out a little bit by establishing
various male arrangements which excluded the female. Even that's breaking down
these days. In every field the female inserts herself. "Equal
rights," they say. So the whole mass, particularly in the Western world I
suppose you would say, becomes a sort of jelly. They talk about
"unisex" these days, which means "nothing." So the woman
lost herself.
As you may recall, according to
the story, she was taken out of man. There is a natural unification between
male and female when there is a man. But that unification is not based in any
way at all upon what either the woman wants or the man wants. Because there was
something in a woman that a man wanted he has remained in subjection to her,
beating his chest the while. And because there was something that the woman
wanted from the man she has remained trapped in her own determination to have
her own way. We have had the opportunity of looking at all these things, and no
doubt we have glanced at them occasionally. And we have had the opportunity of
talking about them. It is a matter of accepting the creative process, isn't it,
whatever that is. We have had some theories about it. We talk about positive
and negative, and the four forces, and all this, which is supposed, presumably,
to make us feel wise in our own eyes. But what has it really meant? There is a
truth to be known, not merely theories to be discussed. There are some factors
in relationship to that truth that it is well that we should become mentally
aware of; otherwise we would be inclined to reject the very thing that we seek.
So we share the responsibility of experience.
There has to be a point of
authority, a male point of authority, to provide a point of orientation. We
know this in theory, and I am sure that many of you have recognized your own
responsibility as men to provide a point of authority, a point of orientation.
You can't do that until you first know what that is; and you can't know what
that is without recognizing and acknowledging the point of orientation of man
that is provided in the creative process. It can't be done outside of the
creative process, so that narrows it down considerably and makes it very
pointed. There is the necessity, then, for men to acknowledge and accept that
point of authority, spiritual authority. Not an authority which is going to
shake a finger and say, "Well you do it this way or else," relative
to the external field of activity.
One of the things that the male
has very largely lost is the ability to communicate, to have communion, with
another male. This is the first order of business in actual fact. Men are quite
willing to discuss all kinds of external things with each other, particularly
over a bottle of beer, but usually steer well away from anything which would
relate to revealing something of the heart. There is fear here. The close
spiritual communion between men allows for the male point of focus of authority
to put in an appearance in an expanded sense; otherwise it can't. There is
nothing available then, and the woman can support her view that there are no
men, because that's the fact of it. She doesn't readily admit that it is
because of her actions that it is that way. But then, because the man went
along with all this subtlety of female control, not so subtle sometimes, he
felt inadequate spiritually but didn't want to admit it. And while I suppose
there has been a certain amount of admission in this regard—otherwise there
would be no direction in which to go—what was necessary has yet continued to be
inadequate. If the ladies want something to do, let them stop wanting to get
their own way. This has become such a deeply embedded habit that most never
notice it. I find the evidence of it, unfortunately, rather blatant.
Let there be men. Then let there
be women. Men are not made to be men by women. That's right, isn't it? We know
that. Men are men because of God, only because of that. If God is excluded, if
the experience of the creative process in actual daily living is excluded—this
is a spiritual experience—then there is no man; there is merely the character
that was forthcoming by reason of female intervention.
We know very well the
mechanics of the situation in the sense of how in the external sense we are
made. We have a physical body; we have a mind; we have a capacity for spiritual
expression. And there is the matter of the heart—of course we are well aware
that it is the impure heart that blocks everything. The physical substance of
our own bodies, we are aware of that. We are also aware of the fact of a mind
of some sort. This relates to substance, vibrational substance, at a different
level to the physical substance, and yet it is not separate from the physical
substance, any more than one band of color in the rainbow is separate from the
others. They all blend, it is all one thing. So physical substance is filled
with mental substance—permeated by it. And the mental substance is not separate
from the physical substance; it is just a different vibratory level. So mind
and body are in fact one. And there is some spiritual substance also, which
permeates the mental substance and the physical substance. They are all one.
But the extent of spiritual substance has been so restricted that only a
distorted limited range of spirit could occupy it. We may speak of this as the
unholy ghost—it is not whole, just bits and pieces—and it is through this
unholy ghost that the control has been present, or the expression of character
has been present, in both men and women.
But permeating all this again is
what may be spoken of as emotional substance, the substance of the heart. And
the substance of the heart is the means by which the connection is made between
spirit and all the rest—physical, mental, and spiritual expression. The
substance of the heart has been wicked. "God saw that the wickedness of
man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his
heart was only evil continually." That is the way it has been. That is a
very accurate description of human experience, simply because the heart was
impure and the remains of spirit that got through was of a distorted, limited,
restricted extent and consequently would be accurately described as the unholy
ghost. And the unholy ghost has been the controlling basis for human function,
human nature.
These are things that we can
mentally describe in this fashion. The description doesn't say really what it
is. We have to come to know what it is because the door opens between heaven
and earth and the Holy Spirit can flood through and bring the understanding.
That is the only way that understanding can come. It can't be gotten out of the
mental realm somehow, through study and intellectual effort. All that happens
is that things get more and more confused. Blessed are the pure in heart; for
they shall see God, they shall be permeated by God. The physical form permeated
by God, the mind permeated by God, spiritual expression is then the expression
of God, the outpouring of the Holy Spirit—whole, complete, balanced, accurate.
As this occurs there is, first of all, a man.
It is a matter of the heart, isn't
it? And men are very reluctant to allow their hearts to be purified. They can't
be purified as long as they keep them locked up: no admittance, no admittance
except to women. And men become devastated on this basis, naturally so. A man's
heart does not belong to a woman; it belongs to God. That is all there is to
it. But men have become so accustomed to opening their hearts to women that
what is of the female floods in, and then the man acts like a pale imitation of
a woman. He could never be a really good imitation! And we have all this
mixed-up confusion and nonsense in the world, where everybody wants what they
want, wants to do what they want to do, and wants it enshrined in law—human law
of course, because the other law, the real law, is there already. You can't
change it. The way things work, the creative process in other words, is the way
it is, and it doesn't allow for any of these human discrepancies. To try to
enshrine human discrepancy in a legal state is ridiculous. It doesn't belong
anywhere and it disappears sooner or later. It could go out with a big bang,
couldn't it? No more human beings and their nonsense! I don't think that should
happen. I don't think it needs to happen.
But there must be authority in
focus on earth from the male standpoint. There must be a man, in other words,
who cannot, will not ever, be pushed
around by women—or by other men for that matter. But the point is with respect
to women. If there are those women who are willing to let their hearts be
purified so that they accept that point of spiritual authority absolutely, then
they no longer feel inadequate and try to fill their inadequacy with inadequate
males. There is something here which relates to the matter of no marrying or
giving in marriage in heaven. There's a hump to come over here. The question
is, of course: "What is it in heaven?" Well you never find out without
being there, and you can't be there except you let heaven come into the earth.
So we share the responsibility of
doing this, but it requires an absoluteness that is absolute. When there is a
stable point of male focus on earth there is a beginning point for what needs
to happen—only because of that. Most
have been so wrapped up in their own affairs that they overlook the one thing
that is necessary: Establish absoluteness from the standpoint of this spiritual
point of authority. Then share in it—be it. But you will not be pushed around
by women anymore, and you know how that happens. The control is there where it
belongs, and only as it is there is there any expectation of anything of value
happening. Whatever may have happened within the range of our own experience has
happened because of this one thing. And because of this one thing there has
begun to be an expansion of male authority.
Out of
male authority women come. That is the way it works. Some of the ladies may
object to it. You are welcome to object but you are not going to change it.
That is the way it is. I say this with a certain authority. You may
say, "Well I don't know whether to accept that authority or not." Try
it. There are those who are accepting it in their own experience, not as
an external thing but as an internal thing, a clarifying, a cleansing, a
purifying of the heart, so that there is the substance of connection between
spirit and form—that's in the heart. What has the heart been filled with
insofar as human experience is concerned? Emotional stuff of all kinds, and
particularly the interaction between so-called men and so-called women.
Let the heart be purified.
"Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." Such a
statement indicates that hearts are troubled and are afraid; that is where the
control is. Women are afraid of losing their control, whatever it amounts to;
and men are afraid, of course, also of losing what they want. Let not your
heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. I suppose this could be said to be
the basic instruction or, maybe, the basic experience to be known now, in this
moment: an untroubled and an unfearful heart which is willing to accommodate
the creative process in action.
Here we are this morning together
to provide that, that there may be a unified, fused means by which the creative
process may emerge in spiritual expression on earth. We perhaps have shared
this somewhat in this hour to the extent that we were not caught in the human
nature state but were willing to let our hearts come free and be purified. "I
shall not want." Nice words. True words. But how much do any of us know as
to what they really mean? We have the opportunity of sharing that because it is
the way, the truth and the life. It is the creative process.
Let there be a man on
earth. Then let there be a woman on earth. What that might be is only
discovered by letting it be. Obviously it allow the fulfilment in male and
female experience based in the state of man, man inseparably one with God, man
revealing the creative process in all his ways, in all his living. Let it be
so.
