January 25, 2024

The Way Of Ascension

The  Way  Of  Ascension





Martin Cecil   April 13, 1980 p.m.


We are concerned with righteousness, with the coming of the Kingdom. It's interesting, isn't it, how good Christians have been praying for centuries, "Thy kingdom come," without anyone apparently realizing that the only way it would come was if they themselves were in position to bring it. We have known about this for some time, but I believe there was a new awareness of the real nature of our responsibility this morning. [greatcosmicstory.blogspot.com/2024/01/bringing-kingdom-into-this-place.html] The earth is the LORD's, and the fulness thereof; every location on the face of the earth is His. We need to live with this conscious awareness, so that we always assume the responsibility for the presence of the Kingdom. We no longer think of the Kingdom merely in terms of material change. This Kingdom is not of this world. It is a Heavenly Kingdom and our representation of it is based in spiritual expression. The preaching of the gospel is the coming of the Kingdom. "And this gospel ...  shall be preached in all the world ... and then shall the end come." Naturally! The end of the old world because the Kingdom has come. And that coming is our responsibility, in company with others who are in agreement. Wherever we may be, moving from here to there, we bring the Kingdom with us, a Holy Place.


All that is present in any particular location is invited into our encompassment, which is in fact the encompassment of the Kingdom. Of course we can only do this if we ourselves are there. We're there because we know the reality of that Kingdom in our living. This is what we have chosen to know. Hungering and thirsting after righteousness we are filled with righteousness, the right expression of living; we are filled with the Kingdom. There is no more unrighteousness present, no more complaint, no more judgment. It should be rather easy to see what there is no more of, but what is the nature of the righteousness with which we are filled? As I have indicated, an invitation is extended. We have an attitude of encompassment which includes all that is present in the particular environment.


As we have already noted, there will be response to that invitation. There will also be some reluctance and some resistance, and some outright rejection. This is of no particular concern to us. We do not have to get into a battle about it. We are not in the business of trying to force anyone to respond the way we think they should. If we made this effort it would be proof positive that we were not, ourselves, in the Kingdom. No one can be forced to come into the Kingdom; no one can force his way into the Kingdom. The door is open because there is someone on hand in the Kingdom to extend the invitation. We are concerned with response primarily, response to that invitation.


This response comes out of the kingdoms of the world, as we were considering them this morning. There is the human kingdom; we extend the encompassment there, and the invitation. There is the animal kingdom, the kingdom of vegetation, the mineral kingdom. We need to have a balanced outlook. It may be that some are naturally in better position to handle one kingdom than another. There are those who have some sort of affinity with animals, there are others who have what is sometimes called a green thumb, and there are those who are chiefly interested in mechanical contrivances. But of course our primary field relates to the human kingdom. In considering all these kingdoms we may be aware that they are all living kingdoms. Presumably we are aware that this is so in the human kingdom and the animal kingdom and the kingdom of vegetation. Perhaps it's not quite so obvious in the mineral kingdom. Time elements tend to be longer in the mineral kingdom; the movement is slower. But there is no kingdom in which life is not moving. There is nothing inanimate in creation.


We have previously taken note of mechanical contrivances of various sorts and the attitude of enfoldment that is necessary. When there is such enfoldment these contrivances become more lively, it might be said. We are bringing life and more abundant life even to the mineral kingdom. A good workman, it is said, takes care of his tools. He loves them, he enfolds them, and the tools respond to his hand; so with mechanical contrivances of all kinds. If one of these contrivances, such as an automobile, is committed to our care and keeping, for whatever period of time, we are responsible for maintaining the life relative to that piece of equipment. There is an attitude of enfoldment, an attitude which extends an invitation to that automobile to share our life. Thereby it becomes an extension of ourselves and usefully conveys us from here to there. We extend the invitation to these mineral contrivances at a certain level. It wouldn't be fitting to try to drive an automobile into this Chapel. There may be occasions when other more discreet tools are brought into the Chapel for various reasons. We have a video camera here and this is a piece of equipment that needs our enfoldment, encompassment. It is indeed invited to share in our service. We appreciate what all these types of machinery can do for the LORD. From our standpoint that's the only reason they exist. Other people have other concepts about it of course. The only valid reason for the existence of any of these contrivances is their value to the LORD. We have opportunity from time to time to extend our encompassment, to include more at that level; and if we love one another, love what is present in our environment on the right basis, all these things respond. We have a responsibility, all of us, to maintain functional and effective operation because of our enfoldment. Sometimes not too much thought is given to this and yet it is part of our responsibility, part of our world. Of course there are other ways in which the mineral kingdom is enfolded too. Perhaps we could think about it a little. But for the moment maybe that's enough.



Obviously there is a right enfoldment of the kingdom of vegetation. We are concerned to raise a garden on Sunrise Ranch, do some farming. We are concerned even with the esthetic value of vegetation. We offer space for vegetation to come into our enfoldment; an invitation is extended. There have been those on Sunrise Ranch who thought of the garden as a chore. It might even be considered to be an unnecessary evil; after all, we could go to the supermarket and buy stuff. But it's part of our responsibility here. This is our immediate contact with the vegetation of the earth. It needs to be handled with love and understanding and enfoldment. The seeds should be lovingly placed in the garden, or in the flats in the greenhouse or wherever, so that they have opportunity to germinate. There should be an enfoldment by all concerned. I'm speaking about Sunrise Ranch particularly, but of course others of you may be associated with other patterns in which there is opportunity to enfold the kingdom of vegetation, inviting that kingdom to receive the Kingdom which we offer. This encourages growth and a goodly harvest. But when we come to the time of harvest, what is the attitude then? That it's a very tiresome labor for the people who are required to go into the garden and reap the harvest? That would hardly be the attitude of one who was bringing the Kingdom, would it? We bring a blessing, we bring enfoldment, we bring love.


We might even verbally invite whatever the crop is to share with us in the spirit of ascension. Of course if we ourselves know nothing of that spirit in our own living we have nothing to share with the vegetation, or with anything, or anyone else either. Our own bodies are the Lord's. These individual earths are the Lord's, and the fulness thereof; that includes mind and heart as well. These are being lifted to Him. So anything that is offered and lifted to us is part of the process by which ascension is occurring, and the fruit is being restored to the LORD.


The same thing of course is true in the animal kingdom. Chickens lay eggs for us. Do we bless and enfold the chickens? Do you ever think about the chickens? Those who look after them probably do, but what about the rest of us? Or do we take eggs for granted? Do we ever have a spirit of thankfulness directed toward the chickens? Those who collect the eggs might well, when they pass through the chicken house, give thanks for the chickens and say so. Bring the thankfulness to a point of focus; don't just brush it aside and say, "Oh yes, I'm thankful." Here are some creatures serving, offering themselves to the Lord through us. Surely we should have an attitude of appreciation, even if we're not present with the chickens.



There are those other creatures who offer themselves as meat. I wonder if any of you who participate in the receiving of that meat from the animal, or the fowl, or whatever, see it in the light of something being offered to the LORD? You know of old, in the days of the Israelites, for instance, there was a good deal of animal and bird sacrifice which was seen as being unto the LORD. I think the priesthood ate some of the fruits thereof but it was still unto the LORD. And so it is from the standpoint of the way we handle what is being offered by these creatures to the LORD. One might well express thanks for the willingness of the particular creature to allow the substance of the form to ascend to a higher level, to receive a greater blessing. Of course we need to be sure that if it does ascend into our bodies it is receiving a greater blessing and that our attitude is not one of cursing in daily living. But we see our own bodies as a way station, so to speak, in the ascending cycle.


Now we see this even in the human kingdom. I'm not suggesting that we become cannibals; but our concern is with human sacrifice, that all that belongs to the LORD should be returned to Him, whether it's in our own bodies or in the bodies of others. We live in the world the way it is. In human consciousness none of us have any awareness of the way it may have been in the past, we'll say before the human failure; we don't know what that was. Some have made the attempt to reproduce that now but it was only a reproduction according to some human concept; it couldn't possibly be a reproduction of the reality, because the reality now is quite different. Our concern is to live righteously in the world the way it is; it's the only one we have, after all; to bring the Kingdom here and therefore to handle everything that is handled in our world rightly. If we handle rightly the state of affairs as it now is, that state of affairs will no doubt change. It's the only way it can change rightly, that's for sure, so that out of what now is may emerge what should be. "Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard" what it should be. All we can do, and this is enough; I'm sure it will keep us busy--is to handle things the way they now are, righteously.


All the things with which we deal are things with which other human beings all over the earth have to deal. Our concern is to do these same things as they are necessary to do but do them righteously. We can't start to handle something that isn't the present fact! The righteous approach is a very down-to-earth approach. It doesn't require anyone to start floating around in some imaginary never-never land but to deal with things the way they are, to bring the Kingdom into whatever is present in one's immediate location of living. This is the way the world is transformed. It is our responsibility to make right use of our worlds and all that is in them. And we find ourselves, individually, handling certain aspects of these worlds. We are cognizant of the fact that countless other human beings are handling these same aspects in their worlds without any awareness of what righteousness in that regard would mean. But we know, and what we don't yet know we will know if we handle what we know in our present environment. Handling that rightly, your environment expands. From the human viewpoint the individual may be inclined to say, "Oh dear, I'm going to have more to do." That's right! The devil is lazy. A little self-examination will see how closely you are aligned with this particular devilish trait. I suppose it may be said that there is an inclination to be lazy because of orientation downward. The ultimate laziness is being dead.


There has been some speculation, I believe, on Sunrise Ranch (and this can be informative to everybody whether they live on Sunrise Ranch or not) as to the possible necessity of reducing the number of people. With this in mind there have been those who have been looking around to see how the work could be reduced, which is not the point at all. The question arises as to how effective those who are now present are in handling the work that is necessary. I don't know what the scale of efficiency would be exactly, but on a percentage basis I doubt if it would exceed fifty percent. I was reading an article recently about the capacity of the brain. I don't know who measured it! But in the computer world I believe there are such things as "bit seconds"; isn't that right? Anyway the human brain is apparently capable of accommodating a hundred and forty billion bit seconds. Now, as I say, I don't know how they measured that, but in the ordinary function in the human world the way it is, most people use only about twelve or fourteen. It seems to me that this is indication of the fact there is a little unused capacity! And it's not only a matter of the brain. After all, the brain is just one part of the whole instrument.


Where there is righteousness, factual righteousness, we find ourselves capable of encompassing undreamt-of fields. This includes physical action too. All this immediately comes within the range of experience once there is alignment with the cycle of ascension. If one is aligned with what is descending, one presumably gets more and more tired, more and more filled with sludge physically, mentally and emotionally, until it becomes scarcely possible to move at all, physically, mentally or emotionally. Our participation in the ascending cycle relates to this matter of preaching the gospel, of bringing the Kingdom into one's environment, so that one is inviting all that is in the environment to rise up and share in the ascension with which we ourselves are aligned. When everything is rising up; perhaps it's not accurate to say everything, for a while anyhow, but when there is a rising up, which there hasn't been heretofore to any adequate extent, then we begin to find ourselves buoyed up. We begin to find that there is burgeoning energy; no energy shortage here. But we have to do it. We can think about it, we can discuss it, and be just as lazy as usual; or we can actually let it happen because our one concern, by reason of our hungering and thirsting after righteousness, is to let the Kingdom be present in every circumstance.



We extend the invitation into the human kingdom, of course; and we provide encompassment for those who begin to rise up in response. But let us recognize that at this level, as at the other levels, there is a variety of encompassment required; it's not all the same thing. We do not, for instance, fling open the doors of the Holy Place and say to the world, "Come in." It wouldn't stay a Holy Place for long, would it, if the invitation happened to be accepted! Of course you wouldn't stay in the Holy Place either. So there needs to be a certain amount of discernment. I suppose as illustration we could recall what the state of affairs was with the Israelites long ago, particularly when they were wandering in the wilderness. They were surrounded by many tribes of the earth, many people. But they had their own Encampment. As you may recall, in the middle of the encampment was the Tabernacle, which included various parts: there was the Outer Court, there was the Holy Place and there was the Holy of Holies. Obviously all those present in the Encampment couldn't be fitted into the Outer Court, let alone into the Holy Place. Nevertheless the Encampment was a part of the design of things. If we see this in terms of our present experience, there is a level here which includes the most people, into which the tribes of the earth may be invited, to be enfolded in the Encampment. Presumably out of the Encampment an invitation is extended to those who might be included in the Outer Court and encompassed there. As I say, that would certainly not include all the people who are in the Encampment. And then, again, from the Outer Court there might be those who could be invited into the Holy Place. Looking at it this way, I suppose you can see three grades. We need to have a certain discernment in our handling of what is present in our human environment, as to the nature of the invitation that is extended to people.


Back along the way particularly, the idea was that everybody should come into the Emissary ministry. Not everybody did; but the invitation was extended pretty well to anyone who would take it up. Of course some took it up who shouldn't have. Perhaps this was necessary in the beginnings of things, because after all there was nobody to start with, so some human substance had to be generated somehow. But there is a design; there is a way things work; and as we proceed there must be a refining process. From the standpoint of our own physical bodies we're not just a blob of flesh; that would be awkward. We have very specific parts, which enable us to live as human beings. The same specific differentiation is required in the larger Body, the Body of the Son of God on earth, so that the invitation may be extended to all the tribes of the earth by the Son of God. But that invitation is extended intelligently, not blindly.


Those who belong in the Encampment are invited into the Encampment. They're not invited into the Outer Court or into the Holy Place. Enfolded in the Encampment, they reveal constantly where they belong. Maybe some who come into the Encampment don't belong even in the Encampment, and out they go again. There is a selective process here, just as there is in our own physical forms. However we have the responsibility of a certain spiritual discernment so that we may recognize what the nature of the invitation should be to those who give indication of response. There are some who move quite quickly. They might find themselves in the Encampment and the door would be opened into the Outer Court. Sometimes that is done too quickly. Anyone who is going to come through into the Holy Place, for instance, will; you can't keep them out. So don't be in too much of a hurry. Let it prove itself out a bit. There has been more trouble generated by those coming in too quickly to a level that they couldn't handle.


Remember, the earth is the LORD's, and the fulness thereof; and it is all holy. People need to learn how to keep sacred things sacred. All too often there is too much talk, isn't there? People talking about things of which they know very little and the rumor mills get to grinding. Trouble ensues. There are those who even feel hurt because they were not informed of something. Well maybe it was none of their business. There was a time back along the way when the ministry was very small, when I suppose everybody knew most everything that was going on. But it's not so now, and it shouldn't be so. I suppose if anyone should know everything it would be me. The Lord preserve me from this! I receive an immense amount of information and in spite of the hundred and forty billion bit seconds in my brain I cannot retain everything. I do not make the attempt; it's not necessary. When something does come to me I look at it in that moment, and deal with it in that moment, and let it go. When people come later and say, "I wrote you a letter on such and such a day outlining all this," I may not remember that I even received the letter, let alone what it contained. But I knew at the time and it was dealt with at the time; and a person doesn't need to drag it forward. It only seems necessary to drag it forward if the person hadn't allowed himself to participate in what had been dealt with. There are those who are inclined to want some sort of a reply to their letters from me. If it takes all day to read them, I don't know when I would reply to them all! It's not necessary. Each individual is responsible for bringing the Kingdom into his own circumstance. I can't do it for anybody. I have my responsibility. Each other one has his or her responsibility. Let them handle it.


Yes, there is a need for a certain amount of training, and it seems to me we have provided facilities for that in various ways: seminars and classes and all this. But it takes someone to accept the responsibility, presumably on the basis of hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and then do it and not expect somebody else to take care of one's own responsibilities. Maybe some of our responsibilities include others and therefore require that others be consulted in the matter. What is brought to me is often to get my decision, as though I wouldn't consult anybody. I usually direct people to those who are right beside them. That's where the learning is needed. Nobody ever learns anything if you answer their questions. Did you ever discover that? Least of all children; they come up with another question.



So let us accept the responsibility of righteousness and bring the Kingdom into the place where we are, consistently. If we do that we are part of the ascending cycle; we have all the understanding, the energy, whatever is necessary, to do what we're there to do. Just because there has been quite a resistance to participating in this process doesn't mean that the results of nonparticipation should be given any particular consideration. If a person is tired and sick, or whatever, that's the way they wanted it apparently. I suppose in a sense we get a little hardhearted. Not really, though. There is a compassionate encompassment; but we're not doing anyone a favor by preventing them from taking their own responsibility. Let's remember that, and live and serve righteously.


© emissaries of divine light