The Instinctual Compulsion
from
The Instinctual Compulsion
Martin
Cecil December 14, 1969
In a recent
service we were giving some consideration to environmental consciousness and
instinctual consciousness. We are equipped with the capacity to experience
both. It has seemingly been assumed by some of the subhuman fraternity that man
has somehow been shortchanged in the matter of instinctual consciousness.
Animals, birds, plants, are all equipped in this regard, but apparently man is
not, the idea being, perhaps, that he has been given a conscious mind as a
replacement. All this is false. The conscious mind is not a replacement for
instinctual consciousness; neither is man lacking instinctual consciousness.
Obviously we have environmental consciousness.
Why is it
that there seems to be the absence of the instinctual compulsion in man, when
it is so evident in other forms of life on earth? The instinctual compulsion,
which in other terms may be defined as an aspect of the spirit of God, reaches
man through his subconscious mind. This compulsion tends to be blocked in man—basically
by the attitude of shame which is present in all people. This attitude of shame
includes other elements, such as fear, resentment, jealousy—various reactionary
attitudes which are commonly held by people because of their environmental
consciousness. However, the reason for these states of emotion which block the
instinctual compulsion from reaching into the subconscious mind of man is consequent
upon the conscious mind.
If, as the
popular theory is nowadays, man evolved out of some other creature, a creature
which back along the way was not man, then the way these things have occurred
cannot be understood, because man did not evolve out of anything. As we have
noted, one species does not become another species through processes of
evolution. There may be some apparent evolution of a species, but not a change
from one species into another. This is pure fancy. So, relinquishing the
concept that man became what he is, describable by the word “man,” through
evolution from some other creature, we may begin to recognize more clearly what
the nature of the fall of man is. If man evolved, of course, according to the
usual concept, there is no need for the fall. It couldn't have occurred. Man is
reaching greater heights all the time, on the basis of this theory. It isn't
true!
The
instinctual compulsion in man, which correlates with the environmental
consciousness in man, relating to the subconscious mind, is the true design
insofar as human experience is concerned. But the conscious mind of man, at the
time when the instinctual compulsion was strongly known and experienced,
decided that it could direct the course of events on earth better than the
instinctual compulsion was doing. Now the instinctual compulsion, in animals for
instance, is still in operation, carrying a certain control in the animal
experience. That compulsion is very capable, obviously. The migration of birds
is an evidence of this, for instance, in one area. Obviously there is a knowing
of what is needful, and this knowing permits the doing.
The
operation of the instinctual compulsion in man originally was capable of
achieving in the design of a human being more than could be achieved in the
design of an animal, or in the design of a bird, or in the design of a fish, or
in the design of a plant. But man had a conscious mind which was capable of
appreciating what the instinctual compulsion was doing, of sharing in an
awareness of what was occurring, of participating in the process initiated by
the instinctual compulsion. However, by the same token, the conscious mind was
capable, having this awareness of what was going on, of deciding that it could
handle affairs better than the job that was being done by the instinctual
compulsion, and so it proceeded, step by step, to usurp the position of the
instinctual compulsion, so that gradually the consciousness of that instinctual
compulsion faded away. Not that it went away, but that it was obscured by the
operation of the conscious mind, in which all attention was centered. In
different terms, the instinctual compulsion in man could be defined as the
spirit of God. The spirit of God moving freely through the subconscious mind of
man produces what is called the Holy Ghost in man. When the Holy Ghost is
present, the instinctual compulsion is present in the experience of the human
being.
The
conscious mind of man has been self-active for so long—all down through
recorded history and of course beyond that, in the history of which we have
little or no record—so the instinctual compulsion is virtually unknown, and the
whole responsibility for directing movement in human existence on earth is
undertaken by the conscious mind, the conscious mind which does not have the
ability, the understanding, the scope of vision, to comprehend what the results
of its own action are going to be. So we have a chaotic condition brought about
by the conscious mind's usurping the position which was rightly centered, at
least partially, in the instinctual compulsion. There is more to it than the instinctual
compulsion relative to the subconscious mind. This might be defined as an
aspect of the working of the spirit of God in man, not the whole working of the
spirit of God in man. There is another aspect, which relates directly to the
conscious mind but which is unknown to the conscious mind until the instinctual
compulsion subconsciously is in operation.
We have
noted this design as it relates to the operation of mind, in our previous
meditations. There is a compulsion which comes down from above in relationship
to the level of the conscious mind, and there is a compulsion which emerges
from below, through the subconscious mind, to the level of the conscious mind.
The unification of these two at the level of the conscious mind permits what
has been called illumination. In
other words it allows the conscious mind to share in an understanding, an
awareness, of what it is that is in operation by reason of the working of the
spirit of God in its dual aspects: the aspect which comes from above the conscious
mind, and the aspect which comes from below the conscious mind through the
subconscious mind.
The working
of the instinctual compulsion in the subconscious mind correlates with what is
present in the subconscious mind. What is present in the subconscious mind
derives from hereditary and environmental sources. As we have noted before as
an example, we understand the English language. There is material in the
subconscious mind available for use consciously. We have the material of the
English language, for instance, so that we can communicate to some extent. We
do not have—most of us—the material for the Chinese language; therefore we
cannot communicate at all with each other using Chinese. What is present in the
subconscious mind derives from environmental sources during the lifetime of the
individual, and from hereditary sources out of the past.
There is
material available in the subconscious mind, generally speaking, in the deeper
levels, which relates to the experience of forebears and others from the dim
and distant past. Because this material is present people have at various times
concocted some theories about reincarnation, for instance. Something triggers a
memory from the dim and distant past which is present in the subconscious mind
of the living individual, and lo and behold, the person decides that he had
incarnated as so-and-so in some other place in some other age. It isn't true!
We can see where such things come from, to the extent that there is
understanding of the way in which the subconscious mind works and the nature of
the material that is contained in it. On this basis we could identify ourselves
with virtually anybody in the past, because there is a pattern of relationship
which expands as you go back. So take your pick, if you want to believe in the
theory of reincarnation. But what a waste of time, because we are here now with
the equipment necessary to live in the present.
The question
is sometimes asked, by those who have awakened to a consciousness of spiritual
responsibility, which might be couched in the words, “Why me? Why should I have
been apparently chosen out of billions of people to know and understand
something of which the vast majority are totally unaware?” As we have noted,
vision and understanding bring increased responsibility; therefore there may be
a recognition of the need to assume responsibility, and most people don't want
to do that. So they say, “Why me? It is unbelievable that it could possibly be
me!” We remember that Moses long ago took this attitude, according to the
record, when he became aware of the responsibility that devolved upon him. He
said, in effect, “Why me? I didn't ask to be made responsible in this way. I
don't want to be responsible in this way! Let it be by the hand of somebody
else!” But by whom? If you are the one who is conscious of the responsibility
and nobody else is, well how could it be by the hand of somebody else?
The fact of
vision and understanding brings with it the fact of responsibility. Well again
the question may be asked, “Why me? Why do I have this vision and understanding
and therefore responsibility? Why couldn't it be someone else?” After all,
looking around one can probably recognize that there are more intelligent
people over there, there are better people over here, etc. Why not these? Well,
of course, first of all the fact is, if it is the fact, that you have the
vision and understanding and that more intelligent person over there doesn't.
If he doesn't, he doesn't have the responsibility that you have, in spite of his
intelligence. It is evidently not a matter of intelligence; neither, I suspect,
as you consider the matter, would you say that it is a matter of goodness. It
is not a matter that conforms with any of the socially acceptable norms. It's
something else entirely. It relates to the nature of the material that is
present in the subconscious mind of the individual.
What is it
that the instinctual compulsion will be able to correlate with in the material
contained in the subconscious mind of the individual? If there are factors
present in the subconscious mind of the individual by reason of environmental
experience and hereditary influences that do have a relatedness to the
instinctual nature of being, then obviously something will begin to get
together here; and as the attitude of shame is relinquished, as reaction to the
environment lessens, what is present in this correlated pattern of the
subconscious mind will be raised up so that a person may become conscious of
it, so that the conscious mind can begin to share in what is happening.
We may see
then that hereditary factors particularly do have meaning in this regard; not
that they should control, but that they should provide fitting material to
correlate with the nature of God, which is inherent in the spirit of God, an
aspect of which is the instinctual compulsion. So there are those whose
heredity predisposes them to what might be called spiritual experience. I am
not talking about psychic experience. That is a subhuman experience, which has
nothing to do with spirituality. Spiritual experience is sensible, practical,
reasonable, comprehensible.
If there are
predisposing factors, material derived from heredity that carries within it a
good proportion of stuff which is capable of being correlated with the divine
nature, then that person is in good position to experience true vision and
understanding, and therefore to accept the corresponding responsibility. If on
the other hand the hereditary factors that may be present in a person, combined
with the environmental influences that have been experienced during life, are
of such a nature that they do not readily correlate with the divine design,
then nothing happens insofar as that person is concerned. Presumably, if we are
amongst those who have experienced new vision and understanding and recognize
new responsibility, there have been elements present in our subconscious minds
which made it possible. Now, can the person take credit for that? I don't think
so. If he can't take credit for it, neither should he rebel against it. The
human attitude is usually to take credit for the things which seem to be
creditable and to reject responsibility for the things that are not so
creditable; but one can't have it both ways.
Insofar as
the human aspect of our being is concerned, evidently there has been sufficient
present at the subconscious levels to allow a certain correlation with
instinctual compulsion, and we have been moved by that instinctual compulsion.
That's why we're here. It worked. Obviously then, to this extent—which is
certainly not adequate yet—it has been proven that there is an instinctual
compulsion in man, as well as in animals and other creatures. It's there, and
it works in spite of and not because of the self-active conscious mind. The
self-active conscious mind generally speaking doesn't like the idea because it
is going to lose its prerogative, and as most people are identified with their
conscious minds the attitude is one of rebellion and rejection of the truth.
Then the conscious mind devises these ridiculous theories in order to bolster
its usurped position. We see that almost all the education, particularly the
higher education, in the world is designed to maintain the supremacy of the
human intellect, as though it were intelligent enough, far-seeing enough, wise
enough, to direct the affairs of life on the surface of this planet. It most
definitely is not! The evidence of this fact is everywhere to be seen. The
absolute chaos in the world reveals the complete failure of the intellect to be
God. Of course it can't be God, because it isn't God. There is a pretense here,
a counterfeit. The conscious mind of man has a wonderful part to play in the
operation of the true machinery of life but it is not a directing part; it is a
part which permits conscious awareness of the creative process which is already
being directed.
Life is
working here on earth. The instinctual compulsion is in operation, obviously,
in the forms of life other than man. The universe itself is an operating
organism. Obviously it didn't require the intellect of man, to be put in
motion. It is working. The spirit of God is achieving in every realm, in every
sphere, in every part of the whole cosmos, what is true to its creative nature.
This is so. The expression of this creative nature, amongst other things,
established the conscious mind of man. The conscious mind of man did not
establish the instinctual compulsion, did not establish the working of the
spirit of God. It knows virtually nothing about it. How ridiculous, then, to
suppose that it could figure things out as to how the world should be run, and
for what purpose!
However when
the true design is in operation and the spirit of God is working in man
according to these dual aspects the conscious mind is then in a state of
illumination, which simply means that it knows what's going on. It is aware of
what is happening. It has the capacity to appreciate what is happening. It has
the capacity to permit enjoyment of what is happening. It has the capacity, in
other words, to be one with what is happening. Originally it was one with what is happening. In that
state it was described as Lucifer, the lightbearer, the angel of God, conscious
of what was transpiring, one with what was transpiring. But when the mind
begins to imagine that it can determine what should happen it becomes too big
for its boots, because it doesn't know. Particularly it doesn't know what the
result will be of what it imagines will be better than is being provided by the
instinctual compulsion. So the best intentions of the human mind bring
devastating and disastrous results, as we may certainly observe all around us
and in our own experience.
The
hereditary factors and the environmental factors in our subconscious minds have
correlated to some degree with the design and nature that is present in the
spirit of God. Because of that, our conscious minds have become aware of
something of which the vast majority of conscious minds are not aware. Again,
we can't indulge in self-righteousness or conceit that it should be so, because
it has happened simply by reason of the state of affairs that was present in
our makeup, and we didn't establish that state of affairs personally. We can
recognize that in relationship to some people national characteristics stand in
the way of a correlation with the design that is present in the nature of the
spirit of God. On the other hand there are those national characteristics which
are valuable in this regard. It is interesting to note, observing one sphere in
this regard, that there are a number of Englishmen who are related to this
ministry; but in order to experience that relationship they had to come out of
England. The national characteristics had some value in them, but that value
was unusable as long as it was being held in the national pattern that remains
to some extent—a constantly lessening extent—in what is called the old country.
Now this
same sort of state of affairs pertains to the national background of all of you
in various ways, if those backgrounds are other than English. There are
qualities and characteristics in all national backgrounds that can correlate
with the true nature of divine being, and if those elements in the national
background which can so correlate are strong in the hereditary elements present
in the individual subconscious mind, then there is an open door for the working
of the spirit of God in relationship to that person when the attitude of shame
begins to be relinquished. Now we have seen that this has been a very strong
barrier to the experience of divine being; but this attitude of shame includes
other emotional reactions which are triggered by the environment.
The attitude
of shame fundamentally relates to the fact of the experience of being subhuman
when one is really human. All people are fundamentally ashamed of this, maybe
not consciously so, but subconsciously so. They are ashamed of the fact that
they are not human beings. As that
attitude of shame begins to be dissolved, then the instinctual compulsion
begins to work with greater effect, making use of the available material in the
subconscious mind to allow the evolution of character to transpire. The
evolution of character, in the human sense, is the development of capacity for
the revelation of divine character. Divine character is naturally expressed and
revealed through a true human being.
We have the opportunity of knowing this as we accept the responsibility which
such vision and understanding as we now have places upon us. So may there be an
easy movement in the unfolding creative cycles.
© Emissaries of Divine Light
1 comment:
Thank You David.
i delight to stand with you in the True Tone and Let it Work here, now, and forever. O what Joy.
Post a Comment