The Vibrational Matrix
The Vibrational Matrix
from Recreating the World
Martin Cecil March 15, 1981
All that exists springs from the
one substance of love and is inseparable from that substance. The attempt has
been made by human beings to wrest the peripheral elements of that one
substance away from the one substance which is the reason for its existence.
The earth as we know it we have seen to be the most spaceful aspect of
substance, and it is this that human beings have attempted to take by force for
themselves. But no aspect of the differentiation of this one substance can
possibly be separated from the one substance. All that really happens is that
the consciousness which makes this attempt ceases to exist, and so death is
known—but it's only known by those who live. As it was put somewhere in the
Bible, “The dead know not any thing.”
We have taken note of what is
describable as the vibrational nature of all substance. The substance of love
is the one substance, which when differentiated into its spectrum by the prism
of truth composes what is called creation. It is the truth of love. The one
absolute solid of love, when differentiated by reason of the truth, composes
creation. Creation only exists because of love; and it is a vibrational matrix, one might say. To
have meaning this vibrational matrix must be translated in some way by a
facility which is aware at least of some of the differentiations of the one
substance. This brings us again to a recognition that we factually create our
own worlds. We see them in a certain way on the basis of our perception of the
various levels of vibrational substance which are within the range of our
awareness. There is much that is not within the range of our awareness, and we
don't create anything out of that; but what does impinge upon our awareness we
create into a world.
The world which is known by human
beings in general is a self-created world. There are certain fundamentals in
this particular world which are commonly accepted in the awareness of all, but
there are also unique aspects of this world created by each individual. I'm
sure you have noted, in considering something with others, that what you see is
not just exactly what they see. In other words there is an individual
translation being made of what comes within the range of perception out of this
vibrational matrix. As I say, we commonly accept the earth. We see it in a
certain way, but we see it that way collectively, pretty well. There are some
who still are walking around on a flat earth, but most of us have accepted the
idea of an orb—regardless of whether it is the truth of the matter or not, mind
you. But we have tended to agree on this point and so we have a common earth,
which is composed of what we call physical substance. However this is mostly
space. It's just the peripheral edge of vibrational substance, and this
peripheral edge human beings try to get hold of in one way or another to use
for their own self-devised purposes. And of course people get together with
each other to achieve certain common purposes.
But it may be seen that all this
occurs by reason of the beautifully designed instrument which the human being
is capable of creating. Man was made in the image and likeness of God. God is a
creator; therefore man is a creator, supposedly also a co-creator with God—at
least this was the intention. But he's gone off on his own and created a world
according to his own devising. And he sees this world the way he sees this
world, “Behold!”—and this exists in the consciousness of human beings.
Strangely enough it doesn't really exist anywhere else. There is indeed
something which has been translated this way. We have called it a vibrational
matrix. Human beings individually and collectively have created the world in
which they live, or in which they die I suppose would be a better way of
describing it—they exist for a little while—because their translation is a
mistranslation.
We've seen something of these
things, but we might remind ourselves of them because the world the way human
beings see it seems to be a very real place. From time to time we need to be
reminded that it is not so real as it seems. It only exists in the
consciousness of human beings, individually and collectively. The universe as
it is understood, as it is seen to be, is a translation on the part of human
beings of something or other—an extended matrix. And so we may have a greater
sensing of the insubstantiality of the world. Because it has been created and
human beings believe in it, and play their parts in maintaining this world in
their own consciousness, paying attention to what is going on in this
translation, they give a lot of weight to it. When you pay attention to
something it grows in your consciousness; it becomes increasingly important.
The importance of the thing to which attention is being paid may be a pleasing
importance or a displeasing importance, but if attention is being paid to it it
tends to increase, become more weighty, seemingly more solid we might say; and
people create their own prisons in this fashion, complete with iron bars. They
fence themselves in. We've all done it. We all still do it, with little
realization of the potency of the creative ability which is still present in
human beings.
While the fulness of the creative
ability that was true of man, made in the image and likeness of God, has
lessened, and of course deviated into destructive ways, nevertheless there is
still a potency there. If you pause to think about it you recognize how you have—particularly when you look at what occurred in the past—created
states in your own experience which were absolutely your own creation. When you
came out of them you realized that; while you are in them you don't realize it.
Well we are concerned with coming out of the world as it has been created by
human beings in their supposed state of separation from the true Creator. What
has been created is then contained in human consciousness—it is in that sense an imaginary world. But having been
given so much weight over so many centuries and millennia it has become pretty
solid in the view of most people. We realize, however, the fact of the matter
is that it's the most ethereal world—insubstantial world. We are conscious of
very little substance, mostly space which we have dubbed with the idea of
solidity.
It can be helpful to take a look
at these things from a position which is not any longer so deeply involved with
what has been created in human consciousness. We can step back from it and
begin to see it as it really is: a world created and maintained by human beings
in their present state, a state which excludes the experience of the truth of
love. Just a very thin, peripheral edge of the total spectrum of substance
emphasizes itself in human consciousness; and everybody fights over this,
trying to get what they can of it for themselves. This fight is an individual
one but it also becomes a collective one, including larger and larger numbers
of people. It becomes a national struggle, for instance, and ultimately
presumably becomes a human struggle including everybody, because trying to get
hold of what is acknowledged as being substance in human consciousness has
produced a world where there is less and less substance to get hold of—not that
anything has changed at all in the vibrational sense.
The vibrational substance in
reality is all still there, but because what human beings struggle to get hold
of is not seen as being an aspect of something far greater but is isolated as
something all on its own in human consciousness, it seems to be running out—chiefly
running out because this is the way human beings translate it. They see it in
this way. “Well it seems so reasonable to say that if you keep on pumping oil
out of the ground it's going to run out one day. Anybody should see that; it's
common sense.” Is it? It's the commonly accepted sense perhaps, although there
are quite a few people who don't seem to believe it. But here is a way that
human beings have translated the situation. We have a world—human beings have
created automobiles in it, that presently run mostly on petroleum. Therefore
what has been seen as being petroleum must be gotten somehow, in order to
maintain the way of life to which we are accustomed. This massive state of
affairs that has been humanly created is nevertheless, one might easily say, a
figment of human fancy. Everything is translated in terms of this very
peripheral, tenuous substance, which has a number of ramifications—petroleum
being one of them, apparently. That's the way human beings have translated it
anyway, but it's scarcely anything if we consider what is really there. There
is this absolute solid of love; that's not depleted at all.
Because the prism of truth has
been lost in human experience the truth of love, which is the differentiation
of the whole spectrum of love, is not seen, let alone understood. All that is
seen and understood is a very peripheral rim around all this completeness. It
is like one edge, we'll say the red edge, of the rainbow, and it is assumed
that all that is is red; therefore anything that is done has to be done in red—a
very restricted state of affairs. This is the human world as understood by
human beings, as translated that way in human consciousness. But there is a
vast spectrum to this one substance when the prism of truth is accepted so that
that translation may occur—differentiation—and the spectrum
begin to put in an appearance within the range of human consciousness so that,
surprisingly, it is found that it's not all red.
So we have a world to recreate.
This has been looked upon as a colossal task. We see the complexity of the
human world the way it now is. How on earth could it ever be recreated into
something more rational? Well of course there are many people who are
struggling to do this. But if we come again into the position of true
perspective we begin to comprehend that it isn't such a massive task as it
first seemed, because whatever is present is only present there because of the
differentiation of the one substance. If it was possible to withdraw that one
substance there wouldn't be anything there at all. And you can't separate the
spectrum of the one substance from the one substance. It is merely another
state of that one substance—but it exists only because the one substance exists—the
substance of love.
So we come again into position to
appreciate the prism of truth and to accept that—even though it may not be
immediately comprehended or understood—rather than the translations that human
beings have made, ourselves included, of the world as it is now known. The
world that is now known is a human creation; it exists only in human
consciousness. It is the way it is in human consciousness because it has been
made that way by human beings. It's easy of course to say, “Well it was
somebody else's fault that it turned out this way.” And we have a considerable
background of earthly heredity to blame, besides people on earth today. But we're one of those, and we are as responsible as
anyone else. It's no use merely looking at that and saying, “Well I'm
responsible, you're responsible, everybody else is responsible.” It doesn't
change anything, does it? There is the necessity of letting the stance be moved. We must stand somewhere else, so that we can see things in a
rational way and we're no longer all involved in this irrational state of
imaginary affairs which has been promoted in human consciousness to what they
call reality.
We all have our troubles. We all
suffer. We have aches and pains. We die. Yes, in that world that's true. But
why exist in that world? And why maintain that world when there is the
opportunity to allow a re-creation to take place in human consciousness so that
a new world takes form? “Well,” a person says, “I'm only one person.” All
right, that's true. Each individual is just one person, with a state of
consciousness that presumably needs recreating. Are we going to sit around
maintaining the state that we have known heretofore, waiting for everybody else
to wake up to the fact that it is possible to let the state of consciousness be
changed? Well who is going to wake up, then? We do it, presumably. In fact we
have brought our human consciousness with us this evening to participate in
this creative event.
Here is the opportunity, then, to
open the door to this new state of consciousness as it relates to our human consciousness now. There is a
sound [Martin knocked on the lectern], a knock at the door: “If any man hear my
voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him”—in
other words substance is being brought in again. Not that it actually wasn't
there already, but we didn't know it. We're being made aware in human
consciousness of the substance that is already there. Also, something was
already there; we know about that; so we bring that too. “I will...sup with
him, and he with me.” There is then a blending of the substance of
consciousness. Here is the initiation of re-creation in human consciousness—one's
own. It is necessary from the
standpoint of our own human consciousness, then, not only to hear the knock and
the voice, and open the door once, but to keep it open. Human beings are
inclined a little bit to close the door. They open it a bit, something comes
in, “Ah,” now they are going to enjoy what came in and see how it may be
applied, and so on. In the meantime, of course, they shut the door again;
they're paying attention to the old state, attempting to create on the human
basis. That's already been done. Why go through the exercise again?
This is a re-creation, something
else, something new. It is the emergence into human consciousness of a
broadening spectrum of the one substance of love—we begin to see more. And this
has happened in our experience along the way. We began to see more. Initially
we saw something with respect to the Emissary ministry, for instance, and
presumably were delighted with that, and we thought we really were awake—we
really knew something. Because we were so enthusiastic about it we wanted to
tell everybody else. But at that point we didn't know very much; we had only
become aware of a little indication of orange appearing next to the red
perhaps. There is vastly more, and we kept finding that out. Well when we
discover that there is orange as well as red, that doesn't mean we have to deny
the red, does it? “Red is no good anymore; we'll have orange now!” No, we need
each color as it puts in an appearance within the range of our awareness. So we
do not deny what we already know, but we do acknowledge that we don't yet know
it all. And there is vastly more of the spectrum to come within the range of
our awareness in this process of recreating the world. As this happens we see the world
differently from the way most people see it. That's right, isn't it?
We may, in
a specific way perhaps, become so involved in our personal experience of the
world immediately next to us that we lose our perspective and we are dumped
right back into seeing the world the way we saw it before. Some people coming
into that state say, “Well, all that I thought I knew was just a dream, just a
figment of fancy.” But the dream is what the person dropped back into—usually a
nightmare. So we keep moving, rightly, expanding the horizon. We can only do
that by constantly changing our position. Our position moves and consequently
more comes within the range of our encompassment; we have a larger perspective
and we see the world not as most people
see it. We have a certain awareness of the creative process, as we call it—we
translate it that way in our consciousness—the creative process, which includes
integration and disintegration.
This being so, we don't object to
disintegration the way we did before; it's part of the creative process. We
tend only to object to it when it comes too close, when our own physical body
begins to disintegrate and we drop right back into the old state. But if there
is something disintegrating there is something integrating too, which would
become the dominant experience if we weren't so hooked on the disintegration.
We're so enamored with disintegration that we maintain ourselves related to it
all the time. We may say that we don't like disintegrating, but we pay most
attention to it. This is why the suggestion that in all things we should give
thanks is sound advice, because if you're giving thanks, well you can't be
complaining at the same time. All attitudes of complaint and criticism wed a
person to the cycle of disintegration. That's what he's looking at, that's what
he's objecting to, and he's making a big thing out of it. And how there is this
tendency to make a big thing out of what is happening of a disintegrative
nature!
But if our movement, our changing stance
in human consciousness, is associated with what has come through the door which
we have opened, so that we are supping in that direction, so to speak, bringing
our substance there, our substance of thankfulness, our substance of delight,
our substance of increasing understanding and enjoyment of what is happening,
then we are in position to receive more of the spectrum of the substance of
love. We include more. The world changes in consequence—the world within our
own consciousness. Do you think the step which brought us to the point of
recognizing a creative cycle, with on one hand integration and on the other
disintegration, is as far as we need to go? Well that has been going on anyway—it's
not going to change anything just because we happen to become aware of it.
We must associate ourselves with
the integrative process, in the recognition that there is the need for the
disintegrative process, but that is not the realm with which our personal
association properly is. There is a lot that needs to pass away: the world
which human beings have created. However, that's looked upon as a horrendous
thing. “This magnificent world that human beings have created! How could that
be allowed to pass away?” or, “How indeed could it ever pass away?” It's going! No, that's not really what
we give the weight to. We have necessarily to deal with people who are
associated with that world. That's the only reason we're still associated with
it. We're there to participate in this business of knocking upon the door—the
door of those who still are involved with the disintegrating world—to extend
the invitation to come out of it, which means moving one's position so that the
world is seen in a different way.
When we see it in a different way
we are in position then to function intelligently with respect to the way we
now see the world. We will not behave the same way anymore. We will not be
trying to do the things we used to do anymore, because we see things
differently. So we handle them differently. Well this is a progressive
experience. We don't take a step and say, “That's it. Now I see the world
differently. I'm going to handle it forever on the basis of the way I see it
now.” But the way you see it now isn't the way it really is. We have to keep on
moving to come to the point where we may have the total perspective, where we
may see things as they really are. And when we're at that point, insofar as we
are concerned our world is recreated. In the recreated world there is
still a creative process going on. Integration and disintegration are going on
but we're not involved in them anymore. They are going on at those levels where
they rightly should—fundamentally those levels where there is no
self-consciousness. That's where this process of integration/disintegration is
going on. The level of self-consciousness does not belong there. That's why
human beings suffer: because they've become involved in this realm where the
fire burns, and it's hot and painful. They are self-conscious at that level and
they don't belong there. Being in the fire, of course, it seems very important
that one should do something about dampening the fire and getting things more
comfortable. But there's no answer in that, because the fire will blaze up
again, even if one succeeds in putting it down for a little.
The point is that we need to move
out of the fire, out of the level where that is what is taking place, where the
separation is taking place—it's a creative process. We come to another level,
and we experience this coming to another level in terms of changing awareness
relative to the world in which we are. Gradually the world in which we dwell is
recognized as being what was referred to as the oasis, or the Garden, in
previous services. We find that we are actually there. We are there, but haven't known it because we haven't been in position
to appreciate the truth of love, the whole spectrum, only just a little piece.
Because that was all we were aware of we thought we belonged there. Well that
little piece has a relatedness to us, all right, but we belong in a different
positioning relative to the truth of love.
So we are not averse to
relinquishing our firmly held convictions about the world in which we have been
existing in times past, right up to this point! We still have convictions about
it that cause us to believe a lie, and we think that because everybody else
believes a lie the lie must therefore be true. Well it is not majority rule,
you know. The truth is not subject to majority rule. The truth is true
regardless of who acknowledges it, or accepts it, or understands it, or
anything else. And four billion human beings can vote against it and say it
isn't true, but it doesn't change a thing, except for the human beings who vote
against it. They suffer the consequences, of course. So there are many
convictions still present in our experience which are shared by others, and we
feel supported in these convictions. Usually human beings want other people to
support them in their convictions. If you can belong to a big enough group of
people, you must be right. If you can belong to a big enough church, that must
be the truth. Not so.
We come to the place, as we keep
the door open in human consciousness, where we may behold the truth. “Behold, I
come quickly”—when the door is open, when it is held open so that we don't keep
slamming it shut in favor of some pet conviction that we have relative to the
fanciful world in which we live. People are always putting great store by such
convictions. “One must have convictions of this nature, and firm opinions this
way and that.” What about? Well, nothing. It is about nothing. It's about a
world of fantasy, maintained sometimes with enthusiasm in human consciousness,
sometimes with considerable objection. But whether one objects or whether one
enthuses, the very attitudes themselves maintain the state. If you are fighting
against the devil, the devil will always be on hand. But if you love him, of
course he'll be on hand too.
So we are in the business of
recreating the world to reveal the truth of love in differentiated expression;
that is, the truth of love as it really is now and now and now. That is not to
say that one recreates the world and there it is: that's the way it's always
going to be. I hope not! You'd get bored with it very shortly, even though it was
so heavenly. No, it keeps moving, but on a different basis, springing forth
from the Creator, with whom we share the creative responsibility. Then a
beautiful world may be created for the habitation of the Creator, a beautiful,
colorful, joyous, wonderful world, made out of this vibrational substance,
which left to its own devices wouldn't be a beautiful world. It only becomes so
because there is someone to make it so. And when we share the creative action
with the true Creator, then also we share the resulting creation, and that is a
joy forever.
I shall be leaving very shortly to
travel somewhere else—it doesn't much matter where. As far as I am concerned it
is the same place. Things are brought to me; people are brought to me so that
we may sup together. We may continue to share with you here, and others in many
other places where we will not be, the factual re-creation of the world—not a
fancy, but something that is actually occurring in our own consciousness and in
the consciousness of those who choose to sup with us, and we with them. Let
this continuing creative change occur. Let us behold the beauty as it is
unveiled by the disintegration of that which has been covering it up. When we
behold the beauty, we are so delighted with that beauty, we're so thankful for
it, that we have no time to fuss about the things that are falling away in
disintegration.
© Emissaries of Divine Light
No comments:
Post a Comment