Friday, July 18, 2014
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
I AM THAT I AM
from
I AM THAT I AM
Uranda May 21, 1953 Class
"And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses: I AM THAT I AM. Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me"
Here we have one of the most remarkable texts to be found in all holy writ. "and God said unto Moses"—now notice this is the answer first—"What shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM—and then He added—"Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you."
First, I AM THAT I AM and then, I AM. Now, why? What is the significance here? We cannot hope to comprehend all of it in these few moments, but we can begin to see.
I AM THAT I AM. And then he said, “I AM hath sent me unto
you.” So we have I AM THAT I AM and I AM. In other words we immediately
recognize the basic principles of two focalization points. The overall
focalization point, and the immediate manifest focalization point. In other
words, the LORD of Lords or KING of Kings: I AM THAT I AM.
Now what does that mean? We can
immediately see two possible applications. I AM that
particular I AM. I AM that I AM. Which I AM? That one.
So we can think of it in that sense. Or
we can take it: I AM that which I AM.
I AM that I AM or I AM THAT
I AM. And if you begin to meditate
on that a little, many wonderful things can open up to you because here is a
basic vibratory pattern of attunement, or association, with the LORD of Lords
and KING of Kings.
But, as there are the two
immediately recognized aspects of significance here, we are not under the
necessity of saying, “Well, which one?” But what are the significances of both,
for both apply? It is not a matter of deciding, “Well I must mean this or it
must mean that.” It means both. And, if we see it then from the standpoint of
the invisible—I AM—the invisible focalization of Being in Reality—that I AM—then the invisible is made
manifest in the visible realm. I AM that I AM. I am not separated, segregated, and set apart,
and limited to the heavenly realm only. I AM in action down here in this realm
of things, in the material world. I AM that I AM.
So we see here, immediately, the
union of heaven and earth—the union of heaven and earth. What was it God had
said to him a moment before? “Certainly”—not with any doubt whatsoever; but on a
positive, absolutely certain basis—“I will be with thee.” Certainly I will be with thee.
Therefore we begin to see, as one
aspect of significance, the fact that the focalization of deity in the inner,
invisible realm has a means for the manifestation of Himself in the outer realm
of Being. The focalization of the Whole, with respect to the focalization of
the Negative Triune World. But there is also the other meaning: I AM THAT I AM.
Now first, what do we think or feel or realize when we express in inner consciousness I AM? Perhaps we should pause to note that human beings are constantly using the two words I AM to establish personal relatedness with ill conditions; association patterns, in other words. I am weak; I am this; I am that. Here we have the key to the patterns of individual, personal association. I AM—what? What are you? Are you going to classify yourself, and publicize yourself, on the basis of what you are in Reality, or on the basis of the limited factors which tend to manifest outwardly until the inner takes control?
I AM—what? Human beings cannot
themselves answer that question. The old idea of questioning, “Whence did I
come? Whither do I go?” etc—and the human being says, “Well, I don’t know. I
don’t know what I am, where I am, where I am going; I don’t know where I came
from.” He is signifying that he does not understand himself and he does not
know what he is. I AM—what? In the outer, unreal realm the human being seems to
be something that he is not, in the limited sphere of being—he has come to
believe himself to be that which he is not. He has established patterns of
association with respect to himself which deny the Reality of Being. And the
human consciousness is inclined to resent anyone who suggests that he does
know; he is inclined to resist. That’s alright, as long as the resistance, or
scepticism, is on an honest basis which is willing to recognize the truth.
In relationship to myself, what man
as a human being could do what you have seen me do. There isn’t one on the face
of the earth, not one anywhere. No man, of himself, could do what you have seen
me do. Then that which I AM is not merely as a man. That which you are in Reality is not merely as a human being. But if we recognize the Reality of that
which I AM, and allow that to be made manifest as I AM, the Reality given form
in outer expression, then we begin to have the pattern of relatedness, correct
association, the union of the inner and the outer.
So, the second statement was, “Thus
shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me.” I AM hath sent
me. In other words, although recognizing the focalization higher than himself,
Moses was not being asked to deny the focalization of deity that was the Reality
of himself. The higher focalization, yes but speaking from an inner
standpoint, I AM hath sent me. So we have the manifestation of that which is
inner and outer.
But then—I AM THAT I AM. Recognizing
the principle of focalization here, we see that the manifest aspect of I AM is
related to other focalizations of deity, and all of these God Beings, or
focalizations of deity, angels, or whatever term one wishes to use, come to a
specific point, come to an apex. First in the manifest realm, and then in the
invisible realm where we have I AM THAT I AM—for here we have at the apex, the
LORD of Lords, the centering of every God Being in the Whole Holy World, the
whole sphere of things insofar as we are aware of it—as it relates to us, it is
the Whole Holy World. The absolute point
of focalization. So, just as the brain contains within itself a pattern of
focalization with respect to every cell of the body, so does the LORD of Lords
carry within Himself a focalization with respect to every aspect of deity in
the whole Body of God.
So, whether it be with respect to
you, or me, or anyone else, as far as the LORD of Lords is concerned, He can
say I AM THAT I AM—by the very reason of the fact of your own God Being for
which He provides the focalization—I AM THAT I AM—and thereby He is present in
relationship to every human being on the face of the earth without exception.
However, that which is the
focalization of deity within the individual does not generally have much
opportunity to express itself through the individual, and the outer man or woman
does not reveal the inner Reality of Being. So, in the sense of the manifest
pattern of action, He doesn’t say I AM that
man, or I AM that woman. No, He says
I AM THAT I AM—for by reason of the focalization of deity in you He is present
in you, because the focalization of deity in you is focalized by Him. And once
you begin to actually realize that, so that there is a consciousness of the
principles or patterns of association in the Divine sense, you begin to have a
sense of the meaningfulness of your own relatedness to God.
Now, I AM THAT I AM. I AM—what? Immediately we begin to recognize that the human consciousness as such, without awareness of the proper pattern of association with Divine consciousness, is not capable of comprehending what I AM is, what the real basis of Being is. I AM—not something that is going to be, not something that was, but something that is—I AM. We could say, I AM the focalization of Reality. But rather than attempting to convey by words to human minds just what I AM is, it is suggested to the human mind that for the moment the mind should be willing to accept that, without trying to comprehend it all at once as if that which I AM is were somehow separate from itself. For if there is an absolute acknowledgement of I AM then there is trust and, in the pattern of association in I AM the consciousness develops an awareness which permits I AM to manifest in the consciousness of man. And when I AM does manifest in the consciousness of man the consciousness of man has an awareness of I AM—and it’s the only way that you can know, within yourself.
So, we do not begin to try to
explain, in the sense of knowledge, to the mind of man as to what I AM is. It
is enough for man to know that I AM THAT I AM. Having accepted that, and having
ample opportunity to prove the Reality of it, we can begin to let it manifest
in us, for it is not by our trying to analyze God that we can comprehend what
God is but by letting God come into manifestation through our capacities of
mind and heart, in the body, that we can begin to have awareness, and begin to
be the burning bush, the point for the manifestation of the Flame of Life that
is not consumed.
“And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me.” I AM. So I AM relates to the center of the focalization of deity, whether in the inner realms or the outer realms. And there has to be a point of focalization. If the cells of your body do not have a point of focalization they cease to have meaning. The cells of human beings must have a point of focalization or they cannot be formed into a body of meaning. “And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel: this is my name forever”—I AM THAT I AM.
© Emissaries of Divine Light
Monday, July 14, 2014
No Promises!
from
No Promises!
from
No Promises!
Martin Cecil August 26, 1979
How open and clear and easily moved
is your consciousness this evening? How rigid and set are the patterns in your
daily living? How firm is our grip upon the state of consciousness to which we
are accustomed? Some may think that state is a particularly fine one, but if
there is a state of gripping on to it, it certainly isn't what is required.
As we assemble together, how much
material is there freed up, already free because you have the experience of already
being free in the expression of spirit before we assembled? From my observation
there are many rather stiff conditions. If there are structured states in your
consciousness, habitual ways of thinking and doing things, then these are all
present, thereby restricting the freedom of flow in the creative field for
which we mutually are responsible.
For many millennia the Lord has
searched throughout the world for those who are in position to be moved by His
spirit; most are not. Everything is set and rigid. How free are we to move
without human inhibitions?
I expect that if I arbitrarily
undertook to move regardless of what was available in the consciousness of
those who are here present, there are some who would be shaken right down to
their heels, some who would be shocked. And I'm not speaking of moving very far
either. But most seldom undertake the responsibility of thinking for
themselves, of following out implications. There is much that needs to be said,
which should be easily said because all concerned have followed out
implications arising from prior considerations. But if there has been little
thinking then obviously ruts are sustained and a more or less rigid condition
prevails.
What is it that may be seen as being
dominant in human nature? Why is it that human beings are persuaded at all to
move out of their lethargy? One way that this may be achieved in human nature
is to offer an adequate reward. This relates to human greed, doesn't it? The
other side of the coin is punishment, isn't it? If the punishment is sufficient
someone may move; that relates to fear of course. So greed and fear are buttons
which may most easily be pressed in human nature to galvanize people into some
sort of action.
Shame is another button.
"What's everybody going to think of me? They could make me feel
ashamed." We can remember some words that the Master apparently spoke,
"Which of you convinceth me of sin?" Who can make me feel ashamed? Who
can produce action on my part by offering me a reward or threatening me with punishment? It became quite evident, in the unfoldment of the experience, that He was not
subject to any of these things. In other words human nature was not His nature.
You know from your own experience of
what is offered through this ministry that, insofar as I am concerned at least,
I haven't offered you a reward. I haven't tried to get you to do anything
because you imagine that you would be benefited by doing it. It's conceivable
that you may have translated some of my words in that fashion, but I've never
been interested in offering anyone a reward. You may remember the ad that
subsequently a number of you have put in newspapers: "Leaders
Wanted." One of the things there
stated was: "With no thought of reward." It's right there! The very
moment that a reward is offered human nature is on the scene.
I suppose it is conceivable that
something which has been said, something in our literature, could be twisted
around to indicate a promise of some kind; but from my standpoint I never made
any promises, and I trust no one else has, to try to persuade someone to do
what perhaps you considered would be the right thing: "If you do this then
you will receive that." We're not looking to satisfy human nature. Human
nature methods always appeal through shame, fear or greed.
We're not in the business of making
promises. We're seeking those who have integrity, who are concerned to do the
right thing regardless. I'm not interested in anyone else. Are you? I trust
not. Sometimes it takes a person quite a little while to get around to letting
that be absolute in his own experience.
Can the spirit of God come and find
everything available in us? What do you think would happen if that were
actually so? Maybe we shouldn't speculate, but I think we are aware that
something remarkable would happen, because we at least have some experience of
what does happen when the spirit of God finds a little bit of flexibility
someplace in us and we are caused to move, relinquishing rigidities.
If we are anticipating a reward we
are associated with the wrong organization. No promises have been made to
anyone—no promises of health, happiness, what have you, which is what human
beings are usually looking for, rewards of all kind—no promises whatsoever;
just the opportunity of accepting a true character of integrity in one's own
living. Then see what happens.
Why complain about the inevitable
effects of human nature? I suppose here is a promise, at least it could be
interpreted this way: The Law works! The Law does work. We reap what we sow,
and because we are not alone on earth we participate in the sowing and reaping
of others. This is the way it is. But we can take responsibility for ourselves,
acknowledging that the Law works; and we presumably have accepted the
responsibility of letting the Law work the way it was supposed to work in
bringing forth what we are responsible for in the name of the Lord. If we don't
bring it forth then we have our troubles.
But even if we do bring it forth maybe
we'll have our troubles too. Did you ever think of that? This is the idea of
reward, isn't it: "Well if we do the right thing, everything will work out
just the way it should." How do you know how it should work out? Of course
that interpretation is saying, "Its going to work out so nice for
me"—reward for being good. But no such promises have ever been made.
Those who come on earth to
accomplish the divine purpose are not looking for a reward for themselves. They're
not looking for a reward for anyone on earth. They are seeking to return what
has been stolen from the Lord to the Lord. Are there enough human beings on the
face of the earth who have sufficient integrity to let that be done, who are
not feathering their own nests in one way or another?
If at times we get ourselves into
trouble, we get sick perhaps; we may say, "Well what have I been doing
wrong?" Is that the way to look at it do you think? If those who are
genuinely seeking to do what they're on earth to do get sick in the outworking
of things, the question is: How is that going to be handled to allow the
greatest blessing to be brought forth because of the circumstance? Would you
take the attitude that if you are functioning the way you should be to do what
you are here on earth to do in the world the way it is, you would never get
sick, you'd never have any troubles? It seems to me the Master ran into a
little trouble along the way. No such promise has ever been given.
All that has been said is that we
should learn to take it as it comes. Let us not judge what comes. Let us learn
to take it, handle it the way it should be handled, even when it comes close to
home. Job gave a beautiful example in all this: "The Lord giveth and the
Lord taketh away; blessed be the name of the Lord.” I will not violate my
integrity no matter what comes. Can we say that? How much does it take now, to
cause any one of us to violate our integrity? Sometimes seemingly not much. When
the prince of this world comes, as he does daily, what does he find? No reward.
No fear of punishment. But whatever is the fact now needs to be accepted now.
Handle the situation rightly now, without shame, without fear and without
expectation of a reward.
There is a prayer that was supposed
to have issued from the lips of the Master, that this cup might "pass from
me." I'm very doubtful if that's
what He said. He wasn't self-centered. He was looking at the events that were
coming upon the world because of what was being set in motion then. These
events have been coming upon the world ever since and it seems nowadays they
are building up in a crescendo. That wasn't a very happy outlook insofar as the
Master was concerned; He wasn't thinking of Himself. He was thinking of
humanity. Forgive them, Father, for they
know not what they do. This was His attitude, and He knew that what was
being done to Him was being done to the whole human race. The whole human race
has been suffering the consequences since and will certainly suffer them
increasingly in the days to come. We can't complain about it. What has been
sown must be reaped. Are we men and women enough to take the responsibility and
to accept what is needful now because we do take that responsibility?
If this is so for those who provide
the essences of leadership then it is so for everybody else too. Let us not
expect something to be delivered to us on a platter so that we don't have to do
any thinking, whoever we may be—thinking on the basis of this movement of the
spirit of God; being alert and aware, with increased understanding, that we may
be accounted of value on earth.
And don't imagine that your value is
in what you think you can do in the external sense. What you do may be of value
if you know your value, but don't try to know your value from what you think you
can do. That isn't your value. The value is in God. The value is in Being. The
value is in the One who says the words "I am." If you can say the
words "I am," and speak truly, then you may also speak the words
"I will" or "I can" or whatever. But you can't speak those
latter words until you are first capable of saying "I am." So don't
build up your ego by all the things you imagine you can do, even the spiritual
things you imagine you can do.
The one question that needs to be answered is: Can you say, and speak truly, "I am"? If you can't say that then you have no value to give to what you do. Value is in being, and that value in being is transmitted into achieving, but the achieving never gives anyone value of itself. It may reveal the value of being, that's all. So let us be intelligent in our approach to these things. All value is in God, the Lord God Almighty. Holy, holy, holy.
© Emissaries of Divine Light
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





